- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:32:24 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAANah+E087zv-SfuNqbgY8OsK+rDT8Wf-6TYPtkdzv5fAfyxBg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Graham, On 25 June 2012 09:54, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > In the past couple of weeks, I've come across two likely uses for > specializationOf from outside the immediate concerns of provenance: > > (1) as part of the NISO ResourceSync (repository synchronization) work, it > is now a proposal for indicating a relationship between a resource which > has multiple possible representations, and a resource which is a particular > representation of that resource. > > (2) as part of my Wf4Ever work on APIs for accessing Research Objects, and > related to ORE proxies, it might be used to describe an occurrence of a > resource within the context of a research object (or ORE aggregation) as > opposed to the resource used more widely. (This is currently just an idea > of mine which has not yet been discussed with the wider project. Note that > such use would not cover the actual contextualization semantics, but could > be used to trace from the occurrence to the more general case.) > Yes, this seems appropriate to me, and I think that its application is not just valid in the Research Object of Wf4ever, it can be generalized to the notion of "proxy" in ORE aggregations. khalid > > This is just for information, and I'm not expecting this to have any > particular impact on the work under way, except maybe to sensitize people > to possible wider applicability. > > #g > -- > >
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 16:32:54 UTC