W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:47:04 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|2aa18aecc775e2dba1554d895af56eb4o5D7lB08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FD988E8.7090508@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Daniel and Paul,
I am now proposing to close this issue (pending review), since all 
definitions/examples are now marked
by a clickable diamond,
Cheers,
Luc

On 13/06/12 22:19, Paul Groth wrote:
> Oh...stylish....
>
> Paul
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>    
>> Hi Paul and Daniel,
>>
>> Have a look at the latest prov-dm document. All definitions are now
>> marked by a diamond.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> Luc
>>
>> On 13/06/12 19:54, Paul Groth wrote:
>>      
>>> I think the solution would be the glossary we have discussed.
>>>
>>> A diamond at the end would also not be bad.
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>    wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Hi again,
>>>>
>>>> It's a problem with all the definitions, not just this one.
>>>>
>>>> Could we have suggestions please?
>>>>
>>>> Is the solution to make the term clickable as Daniel suggests, but then what
>>>> the difference between
>>>> the usage of the term and the definition, since both may be clickable.
>>>>
>>>> Is it to follow the word by a clickable  symbol (e.g. diamond or dagger)?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Luc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/13/2012 05:05 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Luc,
>>>> thanks for the link.
>>>> How do I know that that is the link by just looking at the document? Imagine
>>>> that I am a new user and I want
>>>> to reference the definition. How do I infer the link you have just sent me?
>>>> I can't see it in the table of contents.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe making the word "provenance" clickable?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> 2012/6/13 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a link:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-provenance
>>>>>
>>>>> Luc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06/13/2012 04:53 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/407
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Raised by: Daniel Garijo
>>>>>> On product: prov-dm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding the latest draft, I found difficult to reference the definition
>>>>>> of provenance that we have in PROV. It is in the introduction, yes, but
>>>>>> could we have a separated section just for stating what the definition of
>>>>>> provenance is?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am asking for something like we had in the incubator:
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/What_Is_Provenance#A_Working_Definition_of_Provenance
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>> --
>>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> --
>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>
>
>    
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 06:49:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC