- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:47:04 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Daniel and Paul, I am now proposing to close this issue (pending review), since all definitions/examples are now marked by a clickable diamond, Cheers, Luc On 13/06/12 22:19, Paul Groth wrote: > Oh...stylish.... > > Paul > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Hi Paul and Daniel, >> >> Have a look at the latest prov-dm document. All definitions are now >> marked by a diamond. >> >> Thoughts? >> Luc >> >> On 13/06/12 19:54, Paul Groth wrote: >> >>> I think the solution would be the glossary we have discussed. >>> >>> A diamond at the end would also not be bad. >>> >>> cheers >>> Paul >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi again, >>>> >>>> It's a problem with all the definitions, not just this one. >>>> >>>> Could we have suggestions please? >>>> >>>> Is the solution to make the term clickable as Daniel suggests, but then what >>>> the difference between >>>> the usage of the term and the definition, since both may be clickable. >>>> >>>> Is it to follow the word by a clickable symbol (e.g. diamond or dagger)? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> >>>> On 06/13/2012 05:05 PM, Daniel Garijo wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Luc, >>>> thanks for the link. >>>> How do I know that that is the link by just looking at the document? Imagine >>>> that I am a new user and I want >>>> to reference the definition. How do I infer the link you have just sent me? >>>> I can't see it in the table of contents. >>>> >>>> Maybe making the word "provenance" clickable? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> 2012/6/13 Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> There is a link: >>>>> >>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-provenance >>>>> >>>>> Luc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 06/13/2012 04:53 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> PROV-ISSUE-407 (provenance_def): Link to provenance definition [prov-dm] >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/407 >>>>>> >>>>>> Raised by: Daniel Garijo >>>>>> On product: prov-dm >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding the latest draft, I found difficult to reference the definition >>>>>> of provenance that we have in PROV. It is in the introduction, yes, but >>>>>> could we have a separated section just for stating what the definition of >>>>>> provenance is? >>>>>> >>>>>> I am asking for something like we had in the incubator: >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/What_Is_Provenance#A_Working_Definition_of_Provenance >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>>>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > >
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 06:49:53 UTC