W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:17:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRpFc=YD0kPrWcLRrOD=p0UaXBddNeh5sPMdb0d-mrNX9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi Graham,

We had some requests from implementers to see if there was a way to
allow for something like SOAP or other protocol to be used with the
service description other than http. Note, I don't think we have to
define it just say something about how this could be done. Yes, the
focus is clearly http but the idea would be to leave the door open to
such other protocols.

Paul

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote:
> Yes, if non-HTTP URIs are used.  But the focus of this document was, from the
> outset, intended to focus on using HTTP.
>
> To say more, I'd need to understand exactly what is being requested here.
>
> #g
> --
>
> On 23/06/2012 20:04, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> ISSUE-433: Can the protocol be decoupled from the service definition in prov-aq
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/433
>>
>> Raised by:
>> On product:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 11:17:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC