W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 10:19:52 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|a26a15eebe05f49b2dc41c1615103ec7o53AJw08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FCC7DB8.2080003@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul,

You will see my recent email, with a counter proposal.

3) ternary alternate alteranteOf(alt1, alt2, bundle): the entity alt1 
share aspects of alt2 as described in bundle

Luc

On 04/06/2012 09:23, Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It seems that we have a choice between two options with respect to
> hasProvenanceIn:
>
> 1) do not include the relation at all
> 2) include a qualified version of hasProvenanceIn
>
> Obviously, naming of the relation can change
>
> Can I get a show of hands from the group just to see which is
> currently looked best upon.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
>    
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 09:20:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC