Hi Tim and Paul, I don't see a consensus emerging on this issue. I keep it raised, for now, while we proceed to the internal review. Cheers, Luc On 05/06/12 04:06, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Or perhaps "wasRevisedFrom" to suit the was* naming convention. > > -Tim > > On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > >> PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/396 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: prov-dm >> >> DM editors, >> >> Could wasRevisionOf be renamed to "revisedFrom" ? >> >> I think it follows the "wasDerivedFrom" naming a little more closely. >> >> The Involvement "Revision" (and qualfiedRevision) could remain the same. >> >> I think that this naming is a little more natural. >> >> (yes, this is phrased in terms of PROV-O, but an issue on DM; probably best product would be mapping prov-dm<-> prov-o...) >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> > >Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 07:05:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC