W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:05:03 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|d119238eb80a4dfd53f4c971b67ceae5o5D85808L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4FD98D1F.8040005@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim and Paul,

I don't see a consensus emerging on this issue.
I keep it raised, for now, while we proceed to
the internal review.

Cheers,
Luc

On 05/06/12 04:06, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> Or perhaps "wasRevisedFrom" to suit the was* naming convention.
>
> -Tim
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>    
>> PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/396
>>
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: prov-dm
>>
>> DM editors,
>>
>> Could wasRevisionOf be renamed to "revisedFrom" ?
>>
>> I think it follows the "wasDerivedFrom" naming a little more closely.
>>
>> The Involvement "Revision" (and qualfiedRevision) could remain the same.
>>
>> I think that this naming is a little more natural.
>>
>> (yes, this is phrased in terms of PROV-O, but an issue on DM; probably best product would be mapping prov-dm<->   prov-o...)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      
>
>    
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 07:05:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC