W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

PROV-ISSUE-428 (mimetypes): should we define other mimetypes for other serializations? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:08:45 +0000
Message-Id: <E1ShU0z-0007RA-5O@tibor.w3.org>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

PROV-ISSUE-428 (mimetypes): should we define other mimetypes for other serializations? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/428

Raised by: Paul Groth
On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance

We mention the rdf mimetype should we mention the other mimetypes in section 4.1?

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 23:08:47 UTC

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC