- From: Tom De Nies <tom.denies@ugent.be>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:48:54 +0200
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+=hbbcwRXSN0MMixB19QLVFy8GdeB--=5+B5aQBzOy6bZAdHg@mail.gmail.com>
I send my regrets as well, since I am technically on vacation, and also have a paper deadline tomorrow. I also think we should stick to the decision made at F2F. Regards, Tom 2012/6/28 Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> > I have a pressing task to complete this week, so I shall probably miss all > or some of today's teleconference. > > Regarding Contextualization "What do we do now?", I think we should just > stick to the decision made at the F2F and go forward with the construct > marked "at risk". I shall still maintain by claim that it should be > removed (unless it is linked to appropriate formal semantics compatible > with RDF use of URIs), but at least the discussion can be held with a wider > pool of experts - and it's possible one or other of us may be persuaded to > change our minds. > > #g > -- > > > On 28/06/2012 10:19, Paul Groth wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> The agenda for today's telcon is at >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.06.**28<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.06.28> >> >> We need a scribe. Can you contact me if you can scribe? >> >> Speak to you soon >> Paul >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 12:49:29 UTC