- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:48:05 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org WG" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|a79ecfde836a97db14dbee1aed77f565o555mA08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|6EA5BE61>
On 5 Jun 2012, at 23:18, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu<mailto:lebot@rpi.edu>> wrote:
prov-wg (and prov-dm editors),
I've reviewed all of the materials (that I can find) regarding collective concerns about prov:Dictionary, and
have committed changes to the latest PROV-O owl and html to address those concerns:
* https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/Overview.html
* http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl
The changes are summarized here:
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/index.php?title=Eg-34-us-supreme-court-membership&oldid=7905#PROV-O_changes_made.2C_inspired_by_this_example
and repeated here:
* Added class prov:Collection, as subclass of Entity
* Added property prov:hadMember domain prov:Collection range prov:Entity.
* This supports both generic "simple set" prov:Collection and prov:Dictionary.
* Made KeyValuePair a subclass of Entity
* this follows from Set Collection :c prov:hadMember :my_member and the definition of Collection "A collection is an entity that has some members. The members are themselves entities").
* Renamed prov:membership to prov:qualifiedMembership to follow qualification pattern naming.
* prov:Membership became subclass of prov:EntityInvolvement (though, it could become subclass of prov:KeyValuePairInvolvement, itself a subclass of prov:EntityInvolvement. But we'll try to simplify and reuse prov:entity)
* prov:member renamed to prov:pair and became a subproperty of prov:involvee
* Added property chain (qualifiedMembership o prov:pair) rdfs:subClassOf prov:hadMember
* Added prov:removed domain prov:Removal range prov:KeyValuePair
* Removed prov:CompleteDictionary from DM and PROV-O.
Why?
Luc
You'll notice the prov-o modeling of Dictionaries is not consistent with latest prov-dm.
The prov-o team would like to ask the prov-dm editors to reconsider how collections and dictionaries are defined, so that they reflect the latest prov-o modeling of the PROV concepts.
Regards,
Tim Lebo
cc tracker ISSUE-374 ISSUE-391
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2012 04:48:39 UTC