W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Contextualization ---> Optional bundle in Specialization

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:30:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4FEC4070.6010105@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 28/06/2012 09:26, Luc Moreau wrote:
> The rated agent tool:Bob-2011-11-16 is generated after the tool has processed
> the contents of ex:run1.
> In that case, the syntax, by this I mean the bundle, is part of the semantics.

Eek!  This sounds like pure non-sense to me.

How can syntax be part of semantics?  The nearest I can think of is Herbrand 
interpretations, but I can't see that applying here.  You can't even start to go 
there without having a syntactic and corresponding semantic structure to start with.

#g
--
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 11:32:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC