- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:30:56 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 28/06/2012 09:26, Luc Moreau wrote: > The rated agent tool:Bob-2011-11-16 is generated after the tool has processed > the contents of ex:run1. > In that case, the syntax, by this I mean the bundle, is part of the semantics. Eek! This sounds like pure non-sense to me. How can syntax be part of semantics? The nearest I can think of is Herbrand interpretations, but I can't see that applying here. You can't even start to go there without having a syntactic and corresponding semantic structure to start with. #g --
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 11:32:23 UTC