W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2012

PROV-ISSUE-406 (delegation-direction): Direction of prov:Delegation is non-intuitive [Ontology]

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:14:49 +0000
Message-Id: <E1Se6KP-0004Ir-TU@tibor.w3.org>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-406 (delegation-direction): Direction of prov:Delegation is non-intuitive [Ontology]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/406

Raised by: Stian Soiland-Reyes
On product: Ontology

After the rename from prov:Responsibility to prov:Delegation, I believe the PROV-O mapping of actedOnBehalfOf is non-intuitive with regards to the direction.


Consider the graph in 

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-37-delegation-direction

showing only the qualified relationship. If you read this intuitively, as someone who will find the RDF in the wild - it easily reads the wrong way.


I've discussed some potential solutions on that wiki page:


* Make <code>prov:hadDelegate</code> be the unqualified property and change the direction of <code>prov:Delegation</code>
** Should then be pretty obvious; would not have <code>prov:Agent</code> problem
** ..but wrong direction/term according to DM.. 
*** DM to change actedOnBehalfOf(responsible, delegate) to hadDelegate(delegate, responsible)? 
* Use more specific properties like <code>prov:responsible</code> rather than confusing <code>prov:agent<code> 
** but.. harder to identify the 'special' outgoing link of qualification
* Rename <code>prov:Delegation</code> and <code>prov:qualifiedDelegation</code>
** prov:Delegate ?
** prov:ActedOnBehalfOf  ?
** .. ?


-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 15:15:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:16 UTC