Feedback request
new Primer version for review
Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
junk: limerick
agenda will be late
Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda
Ensuring consistency of terminology
prioritized list of 'issuettes'
Syntax spec, tentative thumbs up
Possible regrets for 2002-11-01 telecon
Fwd: Re: Disjointness of value spaces
thumbs up to publishing the syntax spec and concepts doc
Disjointness of value spaces
Syntax WD - thumbs down
Fwd: Your Ideas Sought for the Mar 2003 Technical Plenary
Re: SEM: 5.5 List semantics
incorporating datatypes into the MT
- Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT
- Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT
- Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT
- Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT
No more labeled nodes
and again with the doc this time...
more comments on syntax
Reworked sections on datatypes and literals
- Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals
- Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals
- Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals
- Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals
- Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals
regrets [was: call for agenda items]
call for agenda items
this time with the attachment
first comments on syntax doc
Syntax doc comments
terminology: what's a data model
- Re: terminology: what's a data model
- Re: terminology: what's a data model
- Re: terminology: what's a data model
- Re: terminology: what's a data model
- Re: terminology: what's a data model
Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
- RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases
completed comments on concepts doc
Syntax Doc
Notes on updates to RDF Schema
- Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema
- Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema
- Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema
WebOnt: Structured Datatypes
- Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes
- Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes
- Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes
- Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes
defining RDF graph syntax
Non-namespaced prefixing text
Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
RDF/XML spec comment
Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
RDF Core WDs document consistency items
comments on concepts doc
Convention for introducing new terms
rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes
- Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes
- Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes
- Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes
The first sentence
Regrets - 1st Nov
Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema
- Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema
- Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema
- Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema
rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string
RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy
xml:lang="" - empty or optional language IDs
Minutes of RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25
request for feedback on domain and range semantics.
rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
- Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level
rdfs:StringLiteral
- Re: rdfs:StringLiteral
- Re: rdfs:StringLiteral
- Re: rdfs:StringLiteral
- RE: rdfs:StringLiteral
- RE: rdfs:StringLiteral
- RE: rdfs:StringLiteral
Re: Minutes 25 May (2001) for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records)
RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review
RDF literals and datatypes
2002-10-25 revision of RDF concepts
Typed literals
rdfs:StringLiteral and rdfs:XMLLiteral
more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase
- Re: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase
- Re: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase
- RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase
RDF concepts
Serialization
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25
Strawman Schedule
concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF
FW: status of LBase
N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
- Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
- Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
- Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
- Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
- Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
- Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment
top-level Comment on lBase
weekly call for agenda items
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
Case of language identifiers
- Re: Case of language identifiers
- Re: Case of language identifiers
- Re: Case of language identifiers
- Re: Case of language identifiers
simple entailments for numerals
- Re: simple entailments for numerals
- Re: simple entailments for numerals
- Re: simple entailments for numerals
- Re: simple entailments for numerals
- Re: simple entailments for numerals
RE: datatype literal and lang
lbase status edit
Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1)
- Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1)
- Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1)
- Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1)
- Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1)
Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
- Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
Re: n-triples for datatype values
Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
Re: "Creating Apps with Mozilla," with RDF chapter, online
Updated version of datatyping code
rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype
datatype literals and lang codes
Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
- Re: Typed literals: current status
Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18
- Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18
- Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18
- Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18
Example code for working with RDF Datatypes (incl. XSD, UAProf, MARS, etc.)
RDF concepts document with revised abstract syntax
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18
- n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]
- Datatyping in concepts document
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18
- RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18
weekly call for agenda items
Typed literals text
rdf:datatype v xsi:type
URIs for datatypes (not qnames)
details of rdf:datatype?
- RE: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- Re: details of rdf:datatype?
- RE: details of rdf:datatype?
Aaron's comment qualifying his vote
Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002
- Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002
- Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002
- Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002
dvd真的不錯
TEST: C-urrent datatying
Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
So now we have tidy literals...
- Re: So now we have tidy literals...
Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
Regrets for 2002-10-18 telcon
draft email voting form
Netscape General Information
Re: incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals]
Agenda for RDFCore telecon 2002-10-11
Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (fwd)
draft question option F
draft question: option C
draft question: option B
Proxy at telecon
Further analysis on straw poll results
straw poll results summary
Abstract syntax - graph or triples
RDF concepts draft
An implementation of proposal F
- Re: An implementation of proposal F
- Re: An implementation of proposal F
- Re: An implementation of proposal F
untidy nodes [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals]
incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals]
straw poll etiquette
Minutes from the 2002-10-04 rdfcore teleconference
possible untidy route
lbase status?
[w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none>
telecon action: decision procedure
email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
- Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals
RDF list semantics
Practical question about rdf:format
action: ask webont for input
friends don't let friends heavy breath on teleconferences
Letting go and moving on...
a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format
- Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format
- Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format
- Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04
Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP
- Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP
- Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP
- Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP
- Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP
Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)
- Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)
- Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)
- Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)
- Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)
Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
2002-09-27 telecon minutes (revised)
Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1)
Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case
- Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case
- Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case
Re: clarify "inline literals"
Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
- Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)
- Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)