- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:00:27 +0000
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, ext Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
>>>Patrick Stickler said: > Jeremy? Dave? Did typed XML literals actually make it into > the RDF/XML and graph syntax? (I've lost track...) Well, formerly XML literals were special, they set an is_XML flag on the literals, hence "foo" compared to xml"foo" Now, the latter is considered part of the datatype structure and hence the is_XML flag is subsumed by the datatype URI rdfs:XMLLiteral i.e. "typed XML literals" are gone. hence my recent question about killing the syntax xml"foo" form: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0403.html which I'm moving to doing unless I get some real problems with it. (Jeremy at least supports this). Dave
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 07:03:53 UTC