- From: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:22:17 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> I would like to hear from the horse's mouth! I originally supported continued use of the old namespace(s), but have recently come to believe that a change is in order, to allow users to indicate schemas and content that have been updated and to somewhat more gracefully identify tools that have not. In the latter case, I expect that new syntax like rdf:nodeID will cause more processing errors/warnings than the vocabulary changes. If we adopt new namespace(s), I propose that the current RDF and RDFS namespace be reverted to their pre-RDF Core versions. > I note that changing the namespace URI is a big deal for tool builders. I appreciate the hassles involved. Mike
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 15:23:22 UTC