Re: rdfs:StringLiteral

Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>

snip

> 
> 
> Frank - I assume your happy with this:
> 
> i.e. untyped literals back as they were
> i.e. rdf:parseType="Literal" creates things of a new datatype - I assume this 
> does not get into the primer (or maybe just a link).
> 
> Please holler if not.
> 


Sounds fine.  I don't discuss parseType="Literal" yet, but probably 
will.  However, since I don't have to talk about the datatype of untyped 
literals, I don't have to talk about the datatype of what 
parseType="Literal" creates either.

--Frank

 


-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-875

Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 15:46:26 UTC