- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:09:12 +0100
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 17:19 02/10/2002 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Summary: use file scope syntactic datatyping mechanism. I was really pleased to see this proposal, not particularly because of its specific merits, but because it suggests that there may be acceptable compromise positions around which the WG might be able to build a consensus. I will allocate some time to discuss this proposal at the next telecon. You might like to think about the following questions: o does it better meet collective 'requirements' than tidy or untidy alone? o what are its disadvantages? Are they acceptable? Do you have a suggestion for a modification which would eliminate/ameliorate these disadvantages? o do you have an alternative suggestion that would better meet our collective requirements? Brian
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 04:12:02 UTC