- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:34:50 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: > At the level of RDF concrete syntax, using namespace prefixes (as in > QNames) might be OK, but I think it would be problematic in an RDF graph > where the concept of scoping is, at best, very weak. In this respect, > the decision to use (just) full URIs as identifiers seems rather sound. > Only superficially compelling. The only syntax that matters here is RDF/XML - we could do the qname to URI mapping bwteen RDF/XML and the graph. I don't think there are any killers here. In particularly I disagree with Patrick when he raises non-XSD types - simply out of scope as far as I am concerned. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 05:35:04 UTC