- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 09 Oct 2002 14:57:17 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 17:39, Brian McBride wrote: [...] > Proposal B: [...] > The object of an age property denotes a string literal [*] from the lexical > space of xsd:integer. works for me. 4. (like Graham, I think I'd rather endorse InterpretationProperties/datatype properties while we're at it. But since that can be done later, and the whole point of this proposal is to be minimal, it's not critical.) > Proposal C: [...] > The object of the age property denotes a member of the value space of > xsd:integer. The object of the title property denotes a string literal[*]. 3 I kinda like this, but I'm afraid there's quite a lot of details to work out with rdf:datatype > Proposal D: [...] > Proposal D is proposal C with some syntactic sugar (the rdf:datatype > declaration) so that it is not necessary to put an rdf:datatype attribute > on every use of the age property. 0 This is gonna clash (unacceptably) badly with existing RDF parsers and with what knowledge users have managed to pick up about RDF syntax. > Proposal F: [...] > The object of an age property denotes an integer from the value space of > xsd:decimal. 0 Costs too much to deploy; undermines the connection between existing data and existing software. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 09:58:12 UTC