- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 07:24:09 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > snip > > I don't think there are any killers here. > In particularly I disagree with Patrick when he raises non-XSD types - > simply out of scope as far as I am concerned. I guess I don't understand this "out of scope" comment. You may not care about referring to non-XSD types (I do), but considering them was certainly "in scope" as far as making the "rdf:datatype" decision was concerned. If you'd like to revisit the "what datatypes we're prepared to reference" question, I suppose we can do that [Brian screams "NO" and pounds his head against the wall], but it ought not to be considered just a matter of syntax. Considering that all we're doing is indicating the name of the type the literal is supposed to be associated with, what difference does it really make? --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 07:08:26 UTC