- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:39:04 +0100
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Hi Brian I just wanted to pick up on the purple bits - all mine. 1: URI Ref The URI Ref section is a mess - I tried to fix it and failed and reverted to the previously published version that you've dissected. For this publication, in your opinion, would it suffice to note that this section is currently inadequate in the detail but captures the main intent; or would you like me to have another go at making sense of it. 2: predicate *RDF* URI Reference accept 3: Graph Equality largely reject - change to Two RDF graphs are equal if and only if they are isomorphic, as follows. rationale: - your term Graph Equality Isomorphism is ugly. - standard usage is that XXX isomorphism preserves the structure of XXX. thus an RDF Graph isomorphism preserves the structure of an RDF Graph. This standard usage (largely) depends on a defn of an XXX isomorphism for each XXX. "respects" has a well-established meaning when discussing isomorphisms and does not further clarification. FYI it indicates that the structure is unaffected by the bijection. If i is the isomorphism then i respects arc labels if and only if for any arc a and any label l, l labels a <=> l labels i(a). 4: Charmod (Not sure why this is purple ... I suppose this will be a substantive change at last call). As it says in the doc, Charmod is currently in last call, and, upon examination of the I18N web site appears to be stalled awaiting advancement of IRI-draft, which appears to be stalled since its author is too busy in IRI-advocacy mode on the tag! I am intending to formally propose the deletion of this para straight after this publication. I feel that it is better to leave it in now so that when we get last call comments from I18N about what happened to thbe early uniform normalization (that is mentioned in M&S) we point to this WD. The failure of the I18N people to advance charmod really leaves us little choice here. Jeremy PS Didn't you have any comments on the changelog?
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 09:40:08 UTC