- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:17:40 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > At 15:16 21/10/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > [...] > >> Another thing, which negatively impacts DaveB, is that it then becomes >> clearer that some of the C14N stuff about XML Literals probably ends >> up in >> the syntax doc. I could try and work out what. > > > That sounds a bit worrying. How large a change is this? Is it really > necessary? > > Brian > This isn't *new* text - just text we already have getting reparented - with all the necessary adoption papers etc. The problem is already a point of unclarity I suspect in our current round of drafts. It's to do with what triple gets emitted in Dave's doc for a parseType="Literal" Jeremy
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 10:17:55 UTC