- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:50:09 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>thanks Patrick I misspoke. > >Should all datatypes be subclass of rdfs:Literal; or maybe only the datatype >xsd:string should be a subclass of rdfs:Literal My understanding is that rdfs:Literal is the class of all possible literal values. So that would suggest that all datatypes should be subclasses of it, unless we want to allow literals which have values but which cannot be given a datatype (Doesnt sound like a good idea to me.) Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 12:50:44 UTC