- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:16:06 +0100
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
At 11:20 16/10/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: [...] >Firstly, one cannot presume that all datatypes define a canonical >representation for all values and thus that it is possible to obtain >such a canonical representation, so basing anything on canonical >representations is simply not feasible. Please stop referring to >canonical lexical forms. They don't exist in RDF datatyping. Puzzled frown. Have I lost the plot here? It looks to me as though Jos is describing an implementation strategy for value based entailments. As far as I'm concerned, that is a relevant contribution. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 14:13:04 UTC