- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:50:16 +0300
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Patr ick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
_____________Original message ____________ Subject: RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string Sender: ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:36:49 +0300 > It occured to me that one likely (and I think accurate) reason why > rdfs:StringLiteral and xsd:string are different is because the former > only defines equality of values, not ordered comparisons as does > the latter. Just a thought... order over natural lang strings is awkward cf Charmod. Which is why they are separate. rdfs:StringLiteral's are nat. lang strings but xsd:string's are not. Right? Patrick Jeremy
Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 05:53:12 UTC