- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 17:41:14 +0200
- To: "pat hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
[...] >>So far, our (published WD) specs have been consistent >>with a view that classes and properties are disjoint. (In >>SWAD, we use that assumption for lint-style checking.) >>The 6Sep decision seems to conflict with the >>use of the datatype property idioim under >>the disjointness-of-properties-and-classes >>assumption. > >I was not aware that there was any such assumption. On the contrary, >in fact: the MT has been designed to allow the possibility of a class >and a property being the same. If this is an assumption, maybe we >should reflect it formally in the language. Certainly that would make >the Webont work a little simpler. i think it's good to have it as in the current MT -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 11:41:59 UTC