- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:54:18 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > >> Would the phrase "object node" would make more sense? > >Yes, you used that a few times, it's better but still awkward though. There >is little clarity in section 2 as to when you are talking about XML and when >you are talking about RDF. ... I'll try and be constructive in my detailed >comments tomorrow. There is an broader issue of terminology here. We have many audiences to speak to and they bring different presuppositions to bear on what we write. So I think it is OK to occasionally err on the side of loquacity in order to avoid possible misunderstanding, eg using phrases like 'object, in the sense of the third item in the triple' Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 12:54:52 UTC