Re: FW: status of LBase

>Peter has sent this message to webont, which suggests the need to show some
>relationship between lBase and one of the SWELs.
>
>[[[
>Also, is there a mapping from any semantic web language (RDF, RDFS, OWL
>Lite, abstract OWL, Fast OWL, Large OWL) into LBase?  I would think that
>it would be a good idea to have at least one such mapping before LBase gets
>to be a W3C note.

Fair point. The next version of the RDF MT document will have such a 
mapping and will be re-christened 'RDF semantics'. I put up a slide 
of such a mapping for (most of) OWL at the Bristol F2F., you can see 
it at http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/OWL2LBASE.html

We could include all or some of this in the Lbase document if people 
feel it is useful.

I also now feel that the document should refer more thoroughly to 
earlier work in 'axiomatic semantics', just on grounds of 
scholarliness and due form. I will put a few sentences in the doc if 
nobody objects.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 13:06:47 UTC