- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:57:03 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
[...] > > > > > > > > <a> <b> "foo"<dt1> . > > > > > > > > The latter is easier to parse. > > > > > > Oh! yeah verily. > > > >I was also wondering about that myself for similar reasons but didn't > >expect anyone else was worrying about such things, and wasn't going > >to propose it. > > > >+1 then > > I think that gives you enough of a mandate to do it that way in what you > write up. I understood DanC wanted something with a separator in between, e.g. <a> <b> "foo"^^<dt1> I then wonder where the possible langstring would fit, is it then "chat"-fr^^xsd:string or in N-Triples "chat"-fr^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> ? -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 07:59:00 UTC