W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: rdfs:StringLiteral

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:02:45 +0100
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDB7B4F8D.2E7D7C2D-ONC1256C5F.00507CF7-C1256C5F.0052A9FD@agfa.be>

I had a look at

  2.4.3 Literals
  2.4.4 Datatypes
  4.2 RDF Literals


and it looks good to me as well, but I'm still concerned that


denote the same value

??? why not have that


*is* the lexical form
and of course for


the mapping fails because the lexical form is not in the
lexical space of the datatype associated with the datatype URI

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

                    "Patrick Stickler"                                                                                  
                    <patrick.stickler@n       To:     "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>    
                    okia.com>                 cc:                                                                       
                    Sent by:                  Subject:     Re: rdfs:StringLiteral                                       
                    2002-10-27 03:22 PM                                                                                 
                    Please respond to                                                                                   
                    "Patrick Stickler"                                                                                  

[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690,

----- Original Message -----
From: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 25 October, 2002 21:35
Subject: Re: rdfs:StringLiteral

> i.e. untyped literals back as they were
> i.e. rdf:parseType="Literal" creates things of a new datatype - I assume
> does not get into the primer (or maybe just a link).

Looks good to me.

Received on Sunday, 27 October 2002 10:03:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:16 UTC