- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:23:03 +0100
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:44 21/10/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: [...] > > > > I trust you logged the hot water as a business expense! > > > > [[ > > Does: > > > > <a> <b> "chat"<xsd:string>-"en" . > > > > datatype entail: > > > > <a> <b> "chat"<xsd:string>-"fr" . > > ]] > > > > Answer: > > > > yes. > > > > > > === > > > > i.e. under the solution sketched by Graham that appeared to have wide > > support, within a system that uses xsd:string the above entailment > holds. At > > the pure RDF level (no datatyping) then it does not hold. > >I agree. > > > I understood that it was that subtle distinction that allows Patrick to > > believe that he can both have his cake and eat it. > >Yep. Yum. Uh hu. So, just so we are prepared, when we get a last call comment expressing some disquiet at this decision what response do we give to justify this decision? Brian
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 04:24:23 UTC