- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 10:52:03 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 09:51, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Brian: > > Jeremy, what did you intend? > > I try to pass the hot potato to Pat! > > (A more serious answer to Graham) > > > I also understand that, following DanC's requests, > > > > _:x ex:prop "foo" . > > ex:prop rdfs:range xsd:string . > > > > will be satisfiable in conformance with xsd:string datatypeconstraints. > > No decision - the current drafts say NO. > > Concepts say a literal is a pair. I asked that Literal be a union of strings with string x lang pairs. Did you not understand the request? or did you disagree with it? Or is it a matter of not having time to write it that way? (If it's the latter, I'll understand if you don't reply at all. Just keep writing!) > Ntriples says "foo" goes to "foo"-"" > Model theory says untyped literals are self-denoting. > > "foo"-"" is not an xsd:string. I'm likely to ask to re-open the question if that remains; this is new information, to me. I'm sure I can't get that design thru last call. > > But, what about this: > > > > _:x ex:prop "http://example.org/" . > > ex:prop rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . > > Similarly, currently this is a NO. > > > > > #g > > -- > > > > PS: in my subject line, I say "test cases", which these are strictly > > not. > > They could be made so by the invention of a new test case. > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 11:51:51 UTC