- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:03:26 +0200
- To: "Dave Beckett <dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>> that's right Brian, it was an attempt which has to >> be tested much better, but it also works for >> e.g. _:x"+0010" btw (for the moment we just exlude >> xsd:string in the "try numeral-to-number-to-canonical" >> another shortcoming is that we have some value range >> limitation for the xsd:long and xsd:unsignedLong >> in our implementation in Java and C# but there >> are possible solutions for that (i.e. be incomplete >> there) > >That's not a proposed datatypes syntax. I said in last telcon, >it'll be <datatypeuri>"string" - no bnodeid. I agree with that (I said btw to express that for later work) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 04:04:00 UTC