Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level

At 11:53 AM 10/25/02 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>The rdf:collection stuff was decided 31May
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0159.html
>but that record doesn't show the "there are no interesting
>entailments around rdf:first/rest" comment that I thought
>I made and I thought we agreed to.
>
>Jeremy remembers it that way, though...

FWIW, that's how I remember it, too.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 09:55:07 UTC