- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:57:39 +0200
- To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> I'm puzzling thru the details of the [6Sep] decision. > > It seems to specify that this holds: > > :jenny :age <...#integer>"10". > => > :jenny :age <...#decimal>"10". > > > since those two literals denote the same value. > > and this one holds: > > :jenny :age <...#decimal>"010". > => > :jenny :age <...#decimal>"10". > > If somebody would please confirm, I'd appreciate it. I'm convinced that above 2 cases must hold it's a straightforward job for a parser to do your "recognizing" for the primitive XML Schema datatypes (at least that's our actual experience) > But I don't see how this works for an open-ended set > of datatypes. Does this hold? open ended will be incomplete by necessity I would think -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 10:58:17 UTC