- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:56:25 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > At 14:48 30/10/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote: > >> The Primer calls RDF a "data model" in several places. Do you want me >> to change it? > > > I think that is a judgement call for you Frank. In trying to get some > consistency of presentation I'm heading towards RDF is a language with > one abstract syntax and several concrete syntaxes as being the 'formal' > model of what we think RDF is. I know not everyone is comfortable with > that, but we need to pick one. > > However, as Graham has pointed out, when explaining things to folks, the > term 'data model' might well be more appropriate so, if in context you > think data model is a better term, then there is no blanket - "you are > not allowed to use that term" injunction. Jeremy's text, something > along the lines of RDF's Abstract Syntax, sometimes called the RDF Data > Model, ... seemed to me to set the right sort of tone. > > Brian > Sounds like a fine resolution to me. --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 12:43:55 UTC