- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:02:04 +0100
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:13 AM 10/25/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: >Is it really that much more effort to look for [a-zA-Z] or >even [^<] rather than '@' and '<' rather than '^^'. > >I can't help but suspect that there are specific plans for >assigning structural meaning to these delimiters in a similar >fashion to how '^' is now defined for N3. FWIW, I think the proposed syntax is just fine. If it has been chosen to fit in with future plans for N3 (and I don't know that it has), I really don't see a problem there. This is a data format that has been designed for expressing test cases, and one of the key tools for evaluating test cases is cwm, so I think a little deference in that direction is not at all inappropriate. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 05:02:05 UTC