- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:11:47 +0200
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> For any datatype one could define a canonical form if one so chose. > So requiring RDF datatypes is a possibility. (Technically I have required > certain transfinite type systems to invoke the axiom of choice! very interesting, any pointer? > but I > suspect all realistic type systems are safely countable). > > The text in the minority version is intended to utilize a canonical form if > one is provided, and not if not. agreed which could make an engine incomplete, but that's fine (and maybe we should express that incompleteness fact in RDF???) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 04:12:24 UTC