Re: clarify "inline literals"

• From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:25:35 +0100
• To: "Stephen Petschulat" <spetschu@ca.ibm.com>
• Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021001092331.025cbe78@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

Steve,

At 08:21 30/09/2002 -0700, Stephen Petschulat wrote:
>Just the opposite, I think it is essential we continue to have non-typed
>inline literals that are "interpreted" at the application level. I.e.
>applications that currently use bare literals should continue to work as
>expected and not require re-writing.

Thanks for the clarification.  I think the requirement here is backward 
compatibility for applications.  I'll modify the wording of UD11 to reflect 
that.

Brian

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 04:28:27 UTC