- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:35:50 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Oct 18 2002 in America/New York
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Oct 18 2002 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Jan Grant
Volunteer to scribe next week
2: Roll Call
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon 25th Oct 2002
5: Minutes of 2002-10-11 telecon
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0131.html
6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION: 2002-09-06#4 jjc
review material thus far on specifics of rdfs:Datatype, rdfs:Literal and the abstract syntax of literals and produce a proposal for wording in the Abs. Syntax document.
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0182.html
ACTION: 2002-09-27#1 bwm
summarize requirements into next iteration of datatyping rationale document
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0013.html
ACTION: 2002-10-04#1 bwm
send message to the list re the specifics of the voting procedure
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0052.html
ACTION: 2002-10-04#2 bwm
help articulate a the tidy/untidy discussion (more statement.. 'can you live with this') and ask WebOnt at f2f
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0055.html
7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions
ACTION: 2002-06-18#12 PatH
evaluate effect on the proposed form on literals on the model theory document
ACTION: 2002-08-16#5 MikeD
Mike Dean to write-up daml:Restriction use case where external type information comes from other than rdfs:range
ACTION: 2002-09-27#2 Sergey
write up comments about changes to API implementation vs changes to applications incurred by change to RDF handling of literals.
ACTION: 2002-10-04#3 ericm
contact the Adobe XMP folk and solicit input to the tidy/untidy debate
ACTION: 2002-10-04#4 bwm
to contact Mark Butler (CCPP) about tidy/untidy issue
8: Book Review
Shelly Powers is finishing off a book and is seeking volunteers to help review it. She is particularly concerned about the chapter on reification.
See:
http://rdf.burningbird.net
9: LBase Document
Propose approve publication as a note.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Oct/0046.html
10: Literal Abstract Syntax
Questions arising:
o Are datatypes restricted to XSD datatypes?
o Do typed literals have a language identifier?
o Does the abstract syntax require a datatype URI to refer to a
datatype and that the lexical form be from the lexical space of that
datatype
o should a parser barf if it sees a datatype for which it cannot
validate that strings are from that datatypes value space and for
which it cannot compute the lexical to value mapping
o is there a generic value entailment in the model theory:
<a> <b> <dt1>"foo" .
entails
<c> <d> <dt2>"bar" .
whenever dt1.value("foo") = dt2.value(bar)?
o The n-triples form:
<a> <b> <dt1>"foo" .
requires further parser lookahead than say:
<a> <b> "foo"<dt1> .
The latter is easier to parse.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/att-0182/02-minority.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0133.html
11: Document Schedule#
2002-08-23#1 DanC review primer text and propose alternative that
clarifies status of Alt
2002-09-06#2 daveb add the rdf:datatype productions to the syntax document
2002-05-17#3 jjc Propose new text to describe serialization of b-nodes.
2002-09-13#2 gk to update concepts doc to cover 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3
to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-13#3 Danbri update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect
datatype concensus
2002-09-13#4 PatH to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect
datatype consensus
2002-09-13#5 FrankM update primer to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-13#6 Jan create testcase to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-13#7a DaveB update n-triples to reflect datatype concensus
2002-20-11#1 jang add test cases from msg Oct/0098
2002-10-11#2 DaveB make changes to ntriple reflecting rdf:datatype
2002-10-11#3 jjc circulate new version of concepts doc
2002-10-11#4 daveB circulate new version of syntax doc, (ready to publish?)
12: possible semantic bugs
concerning domain and range Jos has asked for this on the
agenda
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0288.html
13: Proposed technical changes to RDFS model theory
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0169.html
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 13:36:00 UTC