- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 18:35:50 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Oct 18 2002 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Oct 18 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore 1: Scribes This weeks volunteer scribe is Jan Grant Volunteer to scribe next week 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon 25th Oct 2002 5: Minutes of 2002-10-11 telecon See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0131.html 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions ACTION: 2002-09-06#4 jjc review material thus far on specifics of rdfs:Datatype, rdfs:Literal and the abstract syntax of literals and produce a proposal for wording in the Abs. Syntax document. see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0182.html ACTION: 2002-09-27#1 bwm summarize requirements into next iteration of datatyping rationale document see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0013.html ACTION: 2002-10-04#1 bwm send message to the list re the specifics of the voting procedure see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0052.html ACTION: 2002-10-04#2 bwm help articulate a the tidy/untidy discussion (more statement.. 'can you live with this') and ask WebOnt at f2f see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0055.html 7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions ACTION: 2002-06-18#12 PatH evaluate effect on the proposed form on literals on the model theory document ACTION: 2002-08-16#5 MikeD Mike Dean to write-up daml:Restriction use case where external type information comes from other than rdfs:range ACTION: 2002-09-27#2 Sergey write up comments about changes to API implementation vs changes to applications incurred by change to RDF handling of literals. ACTION: 2002-10-04#3 ericm contact the Adobe XMP folk and solicit input to the tidy/untidy debate ACTION: 2002-10-04#4 bwm to contact Mark Butler (CCPP) about tidy/untidy issue 8: Book Review Shelly Powers is finishing off a book and is seeking volunteers to help review it. She is particularly concerned about the chapter on reification. See: http://rdf.burningbird.net 9: LBase Document Propose approve publication as a note. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Oct/0046.html 10: Literal Abstract Syntax Questions arising: o Are datatypes restricted to XSD datatypes? o Do typed literals have a language identifier? o Does the abstract syntax require a datatype URI to refer to a datatype and that the lexical form be from the lexical space of that datatype o should a parser barf if it sees a datatype for which it cannot validate that strings are from that datatypes value space and for which it cannot compute the lexical to value mapping o is there a generic value entailment in the model theory: <a> <b> <dt1>"foo" . entails <c> <d> <dt2>"bar" . whenever dt1.value("foo") = dt2.value(bar)? o The n-triples form: <a> <b> <dt1>"foo" . requires further parser lookahead than say: <a> <b> "foo"<dt1> . The latter is easier to parse. See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/att-0182/02-minority.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0133.html 11: Document Schedule# 2002-08-23#1 DanC review primer text and propose alternative that clarifies status of Alt 2002-09-06#2 daveb add the rdf:datatype productions to the syntax document 2002-05-17#3 jjc Propose new text to describe serialization of b-nodes. 2002-09-13#2 gk to update concepts doc to cover 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3 to reflect datatype concensus 2002-09-13#3 Danbri update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect datatype concensus 2002-09-13#4 PatH to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect datatype consensus 2002-09-13#5 FrankM update primer to reflect datatype concensus 2002-09-13#6 Jan create testcase to reflect datatype concensus 2002-09-13#7a DaveB update n-triples to reflect datatype concensus 2002-20-11#1 jang add test cases from msg Oct/0098 2002-10-11#2 DaveB make changes to ntriple reflecting rdf:datatype 2002-10-11#3 jjc circulate new version of concepts doc 2002-10-11#4 daveB circulate new version of syntax doc, (ready to publish?) 12: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range Jos has asked for this on the agenda See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0288.html 13: Proposed technical changes to RDFS model theory See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0169.html ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 13:36:00 UTC