- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:52:21 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>, "RDF core WG" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> > Does > > <a> <b> "foo"@"lang1"^^dtype . > entail > <a> <b> "foo"@"lang2"^^dtype . > > for all dtype except the two built in ones for M&S style literals? answer: no. (on the current doc) It would be easy to make the small step back to say answer: yes for when the entail is dtype aware. If we wanted to keep the elegance of everything is typed, and answer no for rdf-entailment (with no knowledge of dtype) I suspect we are making life a touch more difficult for Pat, and the two built in datatypes would need to get special treatment in the MT. I doubt it would be too difficult. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 07:52:30 UTC