w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from October 2002 by date

Friday, 1 November 2002

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] pat hayes
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: n-triples for datatype values Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: new Primer version for review Dan Connolly
• Feedback request pat hayes
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] pat hayes
• new Primer version for review Frank Manola
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Jos De_Roo

Thursday, 31 October 2002

• Re: agenda will be late Dan Brickley
• Re: agenda will be late Frank Manola
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology Frank Manola
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Dan Connolly
• junk: limerick Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema pat hayes
• agenda will be late Brian McBride
• Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda Brian McBride
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology Graham Klyne
• Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda Patrick Stickler
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology Brian McBride
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' Brian McBride
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' Patrick Stickler
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology Frank Manola
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Brian McBride
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT pat hayes
• Ensuring consistency of terminology Brian McBride
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Tim Berners-Lee
• prioritized list of 'issuettes' Brian McBride
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Frank Manola
• Syntax spec, tentative thumbs up Graham Klyne
• Possible regrets for 2002-11-01 telecon Graham Klyne
• Fwd: Re: Disjointness of value spaces Brian McBride
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Brian McBride
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT Jos De_Roo
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema pat hayes
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral pat hayes
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT Brian McBride
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT pat hayes
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level pat hayes
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Frank Manola
• thumbs up to publishing the syntax spec and concepts doc Brian McBride
• Disjointness of value spaces Brian McBride
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Jos De_Roo
• RE: Syntax WD - thumbs down Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Patrick Stickler
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Frank Manola
• RE: Syntax WD - thumbs down Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT Graham Klyne
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Graham Klyne
• Syntax WD - thumbs down Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Brian McBride
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Brian McBride
• RE: Syntax Doc Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Syntax Doc Jeremy Carroll
• Fwd: Your Ideas Sought for the Mar 2003 Technical Plenary Brian McBride
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Patrick Stickler
• Rolling back on lang tags for literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Patrick Stickler
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT Patrick Stickler
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Dan Connolly
• Re: Syntax doc comments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT Dan Connolly
• Re: SEM: 5.5 List semantics pat hayes
• incorporating datatypes into the MT pat hayes
• Re: No more labeled nodes pat hayes

Wednesday, 30 October 2002

• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level pat hayes
• Re: No more labeled nodes Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level pat hayes
• Re: No more labeled nodes pat hayes
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema pat hayes
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Jeremy Carroll
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Frank Manola
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Brian McBride
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Jos De_Roo
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Jos De_Roo
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Graham Klyne
• Re: Syntax doc comments Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Jeremy Carroll
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Dan Connolly
• Re: No more labeled nodes Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Brian McBride
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral pat hayes
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items Brian McBride
• Re: terminology: what's a data model pat hayes
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases pat hayes
• Re: Syntax Doc pat hayes
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral pat hayes
• No more labeled nodes Dave Beckett
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase pat hayes
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase pat hayes
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema pat hayes
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level pat hayes
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Brian McBride
• and again with the doc this time... Brian McBride
• more comments on syntax Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review pat hayes
• Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items pat hayes
• Reworked sections on datatypes and literals Graham Klyne
• regrets [was: call for agenda items] Jos De_Roo
• call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Syntax doc comments Dave Beckett
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Dan Connolly
• this time with the attachment Brian McBride
• first comments on syntax doc Brian McBride
• Re: comments on concepts doc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Syntax doc comments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: comments on concepts doc Graham Klyne
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Graham Klyne
• Syntax doc comments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Brian McBride
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Patrick Stickler
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Frank Manola

Tuesday, 29 October 2002

• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: terminology: what's a data model Jeremy Carroll
• terminology: what's a data model Brian McBride
• Re: comments on concepts doc Brian McBride
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Graham Klyne
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Dan Connolly
• Re: comments on concepts doc Graham Klyne
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Jeremy Carroll
• Re: completed comments on concepts doc Sergey Melnik
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases Brian McBride
• Re: completed comments on concepts doc Brian McBride
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Graham Klyne
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Graham Klyne
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Graham Klyne
• Datatyping literals: question and test cases Graham Klyne
• Re: completed comments on concepts doc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Syntax Doc Frank Manola
• completed comments on concepts doc Brian McBride
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Syntax Doc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Syntax Doc Dave Beckett
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral Patrick Stickler
• RE: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes Jeremy Carroll
• Syntax Doc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes Dave Beckett
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes Dave Beckett
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF/XML spec comment Dave Beckett
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Jos De_Roo
• Re: comments on concepts doc Brian McBride
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema Dan Brickley
• Notes on updates to RDF Schema Brian McBride
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Brian McBride
• Re: comments on concepts doc Jeremy Carroll
• Re: defining RDF graph syntax Brian McBride
• Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes Patrick Stickler
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes Patrick Stickler
• Re: defining RDF graph syntax Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes Brian McBride
• WebOnt: Structured Datatypes Jonathan Borden
• Re: defining RDF graph syntax Dan Connolly

Monday, 28 October 2002

• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral pat hayes
• defining RDF graph syntax pat hayes
• Re: Non-namespaced prefixing text Dan Connolly
• Non-namespaced prefixing text Dave Beckett
• Re: The first sentence Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review Dave Beckett
• RDF/XML spec comment pat hayes
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review pat hayes
• Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes by way of
• Re: The first sentence Frank Manola
• Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items by way of
• Re: The first sentence Brian McBride
• Re: Convention for introducing new terms Susan Lesch
• Re: Convention for introducing new terms Dan Connolly
• Re: The first sentence Aaron Swartz
• RDF Core WDs document consistency items Dave Beckett
• Re: The first sentence Frank Manola
• Re: The first sentence Frank Manola
• Re: The first sentence Dan Brickley
• Re: The first sentence pat hayes
• Re: The first sentence pat hayes
• Re: The first sentence Frank Manola
• Re: The first sentence Brian McBride
• Re: The first sentence Frank Manola
• comments on concepts doc Brian McBride
• Convention for introducing new terms Brian McBride
• Re: The first sentence Mike Dean
• rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes Dave Beckett
• The first sentence Brian McBride
• Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema Jeremy Carroll
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema Patrick Stickler
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets - 1st Nov Jeremy Carroll
• Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema Graham Klyne
• rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 27 October 2002

• Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 26 October 2002

• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy Frank Manola
• RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy Jeremy Carroll
• xml:lang="" - empty or optional language IDs Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 25 October 2002

• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Jos De_Roo
• Minutes of RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Frank Manola
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Dave Beckett
• request for feedback on domain and range semantics. pat hayes
• rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level Dan Connolly
• rdfs:StringLiteral pat hayes
• Re: Minutes 25 May (2001) for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF literals and datatypes Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF concepts Frank Manola
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF concepts Brian McBride
• RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review Dave Beckett
• RE: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Serialization Dan Brickley
• RE: Serialization Jeremy Carroll
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral and rdfs:XMLLiteral Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF literals and datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF concepts Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF literals and datatypes Brian McBride
• Re: RDF concepts Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals Brian McBride
• RDF literals and datatypes Graham Klyne
• 2002-10-25 revision of RDF concepts Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF concepts Jos De_Roo
• Typed literals Dave Beckett
• Re: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Dan Brickley
• rdfs:StringLiteral and rdfs:XMLLiteral Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF concepts Patrick Stickler
• Re: Serialization Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF concepts Brian McBride
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF concepts Patrick Stickler
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Jos De_Roo
• Re: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF concepts Graham Klyne
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Graham Klyne
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Jos De_Roo
• Re: RDF concepts Patrick Stickler
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: RDF concepts Brian McBride
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 Patrick Stickler
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Patrick Stickler
• Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
• more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase Jeremy Carroll
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Patrick Stickler
• RDF concepts Jeremy Carroll
• Serialization Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 24 October 2002

• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Jos De_Roo
• Re: Strawman Schedule Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 Graham Klyne
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 Graham Klyne
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Frank Manola
• Re: concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF Frank Manola
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Strawman Schedule pat hayes
• Re: concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF pat hayes
• Re: FW: status of LBase pat hayes
• Re: top-level Comment on lBase pat hayes
• Re: weekly call for agenda items pat hayes
• Re: Strawman Schedule Dave Beckett
• Strawman Schedule Brian McBride
• concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF Dan Connolly
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Dave Beckett
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Dave Beckett
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Frank Manola
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Patrick Stickler
• Re: top-level Comment on lBase Dan Brickley
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Dave Beckett
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Patrick Stickler
• FW: status of LBase Jeremy Carroll
• N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment Dave Beckett
• top-level Comment on lBase Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Case of language identifiers Jeremy Carroll
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride

Wednesday, 23 October 2002

• Re: weekly call for agenda items Dan Brickley
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Patrick Stickler
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Jeremy Carroll
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Patrick Stickler
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Frank Manola
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Patrick Stickler
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Jos De_Roo
• Re: Case of language identifiers Graham Klyne
• Re: Case of language identifiers Dave Beckett
• Re: Case of language identifiers Jos De_Roo
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Jos De_Roo
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Graham Klyne
• Case of language identifiers Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Typed literals: current status Patrick Stickler
• Re: simple entailments for numerals Patrick Stickler
• Re: Typed literals: current status Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 22 October 2002

• simple entailments for numerals Jos De_Roo
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? Mike Dean
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? Graham Klyne
• Re: Comment on the concepts document Graham Klyne
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Typed literals: current status Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Comment on the concepts document Frank Manola
• Re: Comment on the concepts document Graham Klyne
• Re: Typed literals: current status Jos De_Roo
• Re: Typed literals: current status Dan Connolly
• Re: Typed literals: current status Patrick Stickler
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals: current status Patrick Stickler
• RE: datatype literal and lang Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Typed literals: current status Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? Graham Klyne

Monday, 21 October 2002

• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) Graham Klyne
• Re: Typed literals: current status Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) R.V.Guha
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) Jos De_Roo
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) Brian McBride
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) Dan Brickley
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals: current status Dan Connolly
• Re: Typed literals: current status Frank Manola
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals: current status Dave Beckett
• Re: Typed literals: current status Frank Manola
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals: current status Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals: current status Dave Beckett
• lbase status edit Dan Brickley
• Re: Typed literals: current status Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? Dave Beckett
• Re: n-triples for datatype values Graham Klyne
• Time to reconsider namespace URIs? Graham Klyne
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Typed literals: current status Jeremy Carroll
• Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) Graham Klyne
• Re: "Creating Apps with Mozilla," with RDF chapter, online Dan Connolly
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Jos De_Roo
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Patrick Stickler
• Re: n-triples for datatype values Dave Beckett
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 Brian McBride
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Brian McBride
• Re: "Creating Apps with Mozilla," with RDF chapter, online Patrick Stickler
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype Dan Brickley
• Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype Dave Beckett
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes Brian McBride
• Updated version of datatyping code Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals: current status Patrick Stickler
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype Patrick Stickler
• Re: Typed literals: current status Patrick Stickler
• Re: Typed literals: current status Brian McBride
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes Patrick Stickler
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes Jeremy Carroll
• datatype literals and lang codes Brian McBride

Saturday, 19 October 2002

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Dave Beckett

Friday, 18 October 2002

• Typed literals: current status Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 Frank Manola
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 Mike Dean
• Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 Jan Grant
• Example code for working with RDF Datatypes (incl. XSD, UAProf, MARS, etc.) Patrick Stickler
• RDF concepts document with revised abstract syntax Graham Klyne
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 Brian McBride

Thursday, 17 October 2002

• Re: Typed literals text Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 Graham Klyne
• Datatyping in concepts document Graham Klyne
• n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] Dan Connolly
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? pat hayes
• Re: draft question: option C Graham Klyne
• Re: Typed literals text Patrick Stickler
• RE: Typed literals text Jeremy Carroll
• RE: details of rdf:datatype? Jos De_Roo
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Jos De_Roo
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Dave Beckett
• RE: details of rdf:datatype? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: draft question: option C Brian McBride
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Typed literals text Patrick Stickler
• Re: draft question: option C Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 16 October 2002

• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Jos De_Roo
• Re: draft question: option C Brian McBride
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Brian McBride
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Brian McBride
• Re: Typed literals text Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Jeremy Carroll
• Re: URIs for datatypes (not qnames) Dan Connolly
• Re: Typed literals text Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Frank Manola
• Re: Typed literals text Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Jeremy Carroll
• Typed literals text Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Graham Klyne
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Patrick Stickler
• Re: URIs for datatypes (not qnames) Graham Klyne
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Patrick Stickler
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type Jeremy Carroll
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Jos De_Roo
• rdf:datatype v xsi:type Brian McBride
• URIs for datatypes (not qnames) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Brian McBride
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Patrick Stickler
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 15 October 2002

• Re: lbase status? pat hayes
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Jos De_Roo
• Re: draft question: option C Jos De_Roo
• Re: draft question: option C Dan Connolly
• RE: So now we have tidy literals... Brian McBride
• Re: draft question: option C pat hayes
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Graham Klyne
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Graham Klyne
• RE: So now we have tidy literals... Jeremy Carroll
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Patrick Stickler
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• RE: Abstract syntax - graph or triples Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Abstract syntax - graph or triples Frank Manola
• Re: Comment on the concepts document Frank Manola

Monday, 14 October 2002

• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Dan Connolly
• Re: Comment on the concepts document Graham Klyne
• Re: Comment on the concepts document Graham Klyne
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Graham Klyne
• Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying Dave Beckett
• Comment on the concepts document Frank Manola
• Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 Frank Manola
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Jos De_Roo
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Dan Connolly
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Dan Connolly
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Brian McBride
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Brian McBride
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Graham Klyne
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? Patrick Stickler
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Graham Klyne
• RE: details of rdf:datatype? Jeremy Carroll
• details of rdf:datatype? Dan Connolly
• Aaron's comment qualifying his vote Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... Brian McBride
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Brian McBride
• Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying Brian McBride
• Re: lbase status? R.V.Guha
• Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 12 October 2002

• dvd真的不錯 a@w3.org
• TEST: C-urrent datatying Jos De_Roo
• Re: An implementation of proposal F Janne Saarela

Friday, 11 October 2002

• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Graham Klyne
• So now we have tidy literals... Graham Klyne
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Jos De_Roo
• Re: lbase status? pat hayes
• Re: RDF list semantics pat hayes
• Re: draft question: option C Dan Connolly
• straw poll results recount/check Frank Manola
• Regrets for 2002-10-18 telcon Dave Beckett
• Re: possible untidy route Graham Klyne
• Re: draft email voting form Dan Connolly
• Re: An implementation of proposal F Dan Connolly
• Re: draft question: option C Brian McBride
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Graham Klyne
• draft email voting form Brian McBride
• Re: Worry about RDF list semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proxy at telecon Sergey Melnik

Thursday, 10 October 2002

• Netscape General Information info@netscape.com
• Re: incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Further analysis on straw poll results Brian McBride
• Agenda for RDFCore telecon 2002-10-11 Brian McBride
• Re: Further analysis on straw poll results Brian McBride
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (fwd) Dave Beckett
• Re: Further analysis on straw poll results Frank Manola
• draft question option F Brian McBride
• draft question: option C Brian McBride
• draft question: option B Brian McBride
• Proxy at telecon Brian McBride
• Further analysis on straw poll results Brian McBride
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Aaron Swartz
• Re: straw poll results summary Brian McBride
• comment (sanitized) on straw poll results summary Frank Manola
• correction: straw poll results summary Brian McBride
• Re: straw poll results summary Frank Manola
• straw poll results summary Brian McBride
• Abstract syntax - graph or triples Jeremy Carroll
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals R.V.Guha
• Re: An implementation of proposal F Michael H. Grove
• RDF concepts draft Graham Klyne
• Re: An implementation of proposal F Jeremy Carroll
• An implementation of proposal F Brian McBride
• untidy nodes [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] Jos De_Roo
• Worry about RDF list semantics Jeremy Carroll
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Patrick Stickler
• Re: incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] Patrick Stickler
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Sergey Melnik
• incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] Jos De_Roo
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Frank Manola
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Patrick Stickler
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Sergey Melnik
• straw poll etiquette Brian McBride
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Jos De_Roo
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Jos De_Roo
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF list semantics Jos De_Roo
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Patrick Stickler
• Re: possible untidy route Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 9 October 2002

• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Jos De_Roo
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes from the 2002-10-04 rdfcore teleconference Eric Miller
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Dan Connolly
• Re: possible untidy route Brian McBride
• possible untidy route pat hayes
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Mike Dean

Tuesday, 8 October 2002

• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Frank Manola
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Brian McBride
• lbase status? Dan Brickley
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Brian McBride
• [w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none> Brian McBride
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Frank Manola
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Patrick Stickler
• telecon action: decision procedure Brian McBride
• Re: RDF list semantics Brian McBride

Monday, 7 October 2002

• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Graham Klyne
• email straw poll: literal semantics proposals Brian McBride
• Re: Practical question about rdf:format Graham Klyne
• RDF list semantics Graham Klyne
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 Eric Miller
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 Patrick Stickler
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 Brian McBride
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 Patrick Stickler
• Practical question about rdf:format Patrick Stickler
• action: ask webont for input: version 2 Brian McBride

Saturday, 5 October 2002

• Re: action: ask webont for input Jos De_Roo
• action: ask webont for input Brian McBride

Friday, 4 October 2002

• friends don't let friends heavy breath on teleconferences Dan Brickley
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format Dan Connolly
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format Jeremy Carroll
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04 Patrick Stickler
• Letting go and moving on... Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 3 October 2002

• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format Jos De_Roo
• a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format Dan Connolly
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Jos De_Roo
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Brian McBride
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Dan Connolly
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Brian McBride

Wednesday, 2 October 2002

• RE: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Frank Manola
• RE: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Jos De_Roo
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Dave Beckett
• Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Sergey Melnik
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Brian McBride
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Brian McBride
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Dan Connolly
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Dan Connolly
• Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) Brian McBride

Tuesday, 1 October 2002

• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Jos De_Roo
• Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case Graham Klyne
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) Graham Klyne
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Graham Klyne
• 2002-09-27 telecon minutes (revised) Graham Klyne
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Dave Beckett
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) Brian McBride
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Sergey Melnik
• Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case Jos De_Roo
• Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case Brian McBride
• Re: clarify "inline literals" Brian McBride
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) Sergey Melnik
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? Brian McBride

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2002 23:29:35 UTC