- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:21:07 +0100
- To: "Graham Klyne <GK" <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> Starting with Brian's comments, and then employing a lot of editorial > discretion, I've done a major rework on the sections about datatypes and > literals. > > The main goal of this rework was to progressively introduce the concepts, > so the datatypes section has been moved ahead of literals, and the datatype > examples have been split across the two sections. > > The rework is attached to this message. It's not very long -- I'm posting > the two sections to solicit feedback from the group, and make sure I > haven't distorted the intent in any way. (There's still an issue of > requiring a lexical representation for each value [1] outstanding, which I > haven't got round to addressing yet, so please don't flame me on that just > yet.) good work Graham, I have no burning remarks after all, maybe it's not a bad idea to have the langId only for untyped literals and XMLLiterals ... -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 15:18:28 UTC