- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:33:43 +0200
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
[...] > Let me put it as a test case. > > Does > > <a> <b> "foo"@"lang1"^^dtype . > entail > <a> <b> "foo"@"lang2"^^dtype . > > for all dtype except the two built in ones for M&S style literals? I'm getting an answer of no (no proof found, which is not the same as a nonconclusion) although if dtype would be a builtin xsdtype then in that case it would be yes (even in the unintuitive case of "chat"@en^^xsd:string being the same as "chat"@fr^^xsd:string) -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 09:35:23 UTC