Sunday, 31 May 2009
Friday, 29 May 2009
- question on "forest-like anonymous individuals" restriction of OWL 2 DL
- Minutes ready for review
- Re: glyphs problem 'solved' (FYI, challenges with fonts)
- Re: glyphs problem 'solved' (FYI, challenges with fonts)
- Re: glyphs problem 'solved' (FYI, challenges with fonts)
- Re: glyphs problem 'solved' (FYI, challenges with fonts)
- glyphs problem 'solved' (FYI, challenges with fonts)
Thursday, 28 May 2009
- Re: Implemented resolution of "rdf:PlainLiteral" in Quick Reference Guide
- Re: Implemented resolution of "rdf:PlainLiteral" in Quick Reference Guide
- Implemented resolution of "rdf:PlainLiteral" in Quick Reference Guide
- Re: One tiny detail that I want to confirm.
- implemented resolution of "rdf:PlainLiteral" in RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Testing the (RL) testing...
- RE: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: One tiny detail that I want to confirm.
- One tiny detail that I want to confirm.
Wednesday, 27 May 2009
- Re: abbreviations of string literals
- Re: abbreviations of string literals
- Test case exports by profile
- Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
- Fwd: Status of OWL 2 Conformance
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: abbreviations of string literals
- Re: abbreviations of string literals
- Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
- RE: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
- Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Conformance
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Conformance
- abbreviations of string literals
- Re: Mini editorial comment son the QRG
- Re: Mini editorial comment son the QRG
- Mini editorial comment son the QRG
- Re: First Look version of the test collection for the RDF-Based Semantics
- RE: First Look version of the test collection for the RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
Tuesday, 26 May 2009
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: First Look version of the test collection for the RDF-Based Semantics
- First Look version of the test collection for the RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: rdf:text at risk? [RE: Agenda TC 27/05/2009]
- rdf:text at risk? [RE: Agenda TC 27/05/2009]
- Agenda TC 27/05/2009
Monday, 25 May 2009
- Re: preview drafts
- RE: preview drafts
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: preview drafts
- the current state of the rdf:text document
Sunday, 24 May 2009
- Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ...
- Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ...
- RE: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ...
- Re: renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral and other issues with the proposal
- Re: renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral and other issues with the proposal
- Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ...
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
Saturday, 23 May 2009
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ...
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- general stuff about rdf:text / rdf:PlainLiteral / ...
- Re: renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral and other issues with the proposal
- RE: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- RE: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- RE: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- (poll) renaming rdf:text to rdf:plainLiteral
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
Friday, 22 May 2009
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: CR Exit Criteria
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
Thursday, 21 May 2009
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: preview drafts
- RE: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: preview drafts
- Re: preview drafts
- preview drafts
- Re: Check links
- Re: Check links
- Re: Check links
- Re: Check links
- Re: Check links
- Re: Check links
- status of Quick Reference Guide
- Re: Primer Review
- RE: Check links
- RE: preview drafts
- Check links
- Re: preview drafts
- RE: preview drafts
- RE: preview drafts
- preview drafts
Wednesday, 20 May 2009
- CR Exit Criteria
- Re: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- RE: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- ECDL 2009 - DOCTORAL CONSORTIUM / LIST OF ACCEPTED PAPERS
- RE: OWL Full Features in QRG
- near-duplicate postings
- fallback on rdf:text
- fallback position on rdf:text
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Profiles
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Profiles
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Profiles
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- RE: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Re: Primer Review
- exit criteria
- Re: change in vocabulary for annotated axioms and annotations
- Re: Primer Review
- Re: Primer Review
- Re: Primer Review
- Re: Primer Review
- Re: Primer Review
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Review of Primer
Tuesday, 19 May 2009
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- RE: Review of Primer
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Agenda TC 20/05/09
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Fwd: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Direct Semantics
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Review of Manchester Syntax Document
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- NF&R status
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
Monday, 18 May 2009
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- RE: change in vocabulary for annotated axioms and annotations
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: change in vocabulary for annotated axioms and annotations
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
- change in vocabulary for annotated axioms and annotations
- Re: Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Votes to advance documents to LC and CR
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Re: Minutes of last week meeting
- Minutes of last week meeting
- Re: Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Re: New draft for JC5
Sunday, 17 May 2009
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Overview
- RE: New draft for JC5
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Overview
- Re: New draft for JC5
- Re: New draft for JC5
- Re: New draft for JC5
- New draft for JC5
- RE: Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- RE: Status of OWL 2 Direct Semantics
Saturday, 16 May 2009
- Re: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Overview
- RE: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Response to JC5
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Conformance
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Conformance
- Re: Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- Re: Status of OWL 2 Overview
- Status of OWL 2 XML Serialization
- Status of OWL 2 Profiles
- Status of OWL 2 Conformance
- Status of OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics
- Status of OWL 2 Direct Semantics
- Status of OWL 2 Mapping to RDF Graphs
- Status of OWL 2 Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax
- Status of OWL 2 Overview
- Re: draft response for JC2
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Primer Review
- Response to LC comment TL1
- Response to LC comment BG1
Friday, 15 May 2009
- Re: draft response for JC2
- RE: Response to JC5
- Re: Response to JC5
- Re: draft response for JC2
- Re: Response to JC5
- Re: Response to JC5
- Re: draft response for JC2
- Re: Response to JC5
- Re: draft response for JC2
- Re: Response to JC5
- RE: Response to JC5
- draft response for JC2
- JC5 (annotation vocabulary): Reply from Top Quadrant
- Response to JC5
- Re: JC6, (yet another) response drafted
- LC response RA1
- JC6, (yet another) response drafted
Thursday, 14 May 2009
- RE: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: versioning in NF&R
- Re: versioning in NF&R
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- Re: versioning in NF&R
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- Re: versioning in NF&R
- RE: A proposal for clarifying the definitions of datatype maps
- versioning in NF&R
- RE: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- RE: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- Re: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
Wednesday, 13 May 2009
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- Primer Review
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- Re: [LC response] To Richard H. McCullough
- RE: JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- JC5 and possibly replacing owl:subject, owl:predicate, and owl:object
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: Review of Primer
- RE: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- RE: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- RE: LC reply drafted
- RE: error in RDF TR on rdf:predicate
- RE: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: Review of Primer
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: LC reply drafted
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: LC reply drafted
- Re: LC reply drafted
- RE: LC reply drafted
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- Re: draft responses for four JC LC comments
- draft responses for four JC LC comments
- error in RDF TR on rdf:predicate
- Review of Primer
- Review of Primer
Tuesday, 12 May 2009
- Re: LC reply drafted
- Re: LC reply drafted
- LC reply to Simon Paradies
- Re: LC reply drafted
- Re: LC reply drafted
- LC reply drafted
- Agenda TC 13/05/2009
Monday, 11 May 2009
Sunday, 10 May 2009
Thursday, 7 May 2009
Wednesday, 6 May 2009
- Minutes of 29 April: Removed "FIXME"s
- RE: template references
- Re: template references
- template references
- Re: Minutes from today available for review
- RE: OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
- Minutes from today available for review
- Fwd: [LC response] To C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: NF&R Review
- analysis of Sperberg-McQueen LC comment re: Ruby test/ BIDI insufficiency
- Re: QRG - a suggestion
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: QRG - a suggestion
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG
- Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
- Re: QRG - a suggestion
- RE: Progress on QRG
- RE: A proposal for clarifying the definitions of datatype maps
- RE: OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
- NF&R Review
- QRG - a suggestion
- Re: Agenda TC 06/05/2009
- Re: Issue-104
- tiny comment on the Q&R
- Re: Agenda TC 06/05/2009
- Re: Review of QRG
- Re: Agenda TC 06/05/2009
- Re: Agenda TC 06/05/2009
- Re: Review of QRG
Tuesday, 5 May 2009
- Re: Progress on QRG
- OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
- RE: Issue-104
- Re: Issue-104
- Re: Quick review of QRG
- Agenda TC 06/05/2009
- Re: A proposal for clarifying the definitions of datatype maps
- Quick review of QRG
Monday, 4 May 2009
- [Fwd: XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 a Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations)]
- Re: Quick Review of New Features and Rationale
Sunday, 3 May 2009
- Re: Progress on QRG
- Re: Review of QRG
- Re: Progress on QRG
- Re: Review of QRG
- Re: Progress on QRG
- Review of QRG
- Re: Response to Nick Main drafted
- Re: Response to Nick Main drafted
- Response to Nick Main drafted