Re: Mini editorial comment son the QRG

Hi Ivan

I implemented all your suggestions, please check the diff

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Quick_Reference_Guide&diff=24171&oldid=24161

Thank you for the kind review.

Jie

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi Jie,
>
> just tiny thing (just in time before tonight's vote on the QRG:-)
>
> - Section 1, table on notational conventions, first column last entry: a
> missing opening '(' is missing...
>
> - You've put, in section 2.2, a link to
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#def_object_property
>
> in the functional syntax cell for named object property; you should
> probably do the same in 2.1 for the named class for symmetry
>
> - Section 2.5, table on Assertions, there is a missing link to the
> primer for 'individual equality' (the link is actually identical to the
> one for inequality)
>
> - In the same table you have a line for 'positive inverse object
> property assertion'. I am not 100% sure it is necessary to have it
> there, it seems to reflect the combination of other things in the
> functional syntax, and the RDF version is, well, trivial...
>
> - Section 2.8, line on prefix declaration: the "@prefix p U." cell for
> RDF syntax might be misunderstood. The way to set the prefix depends on
> the serialization and this entry suggests that this is a generic RDF
> syntax for it (which is not). I would suggest to leave the cell entry or
> put a note into it saying that this depends on RDF serialization... (eg,
> SPARQL uses a different syntax...)
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Ivan
>
>
> --
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>



-- 
Jie Bao
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 13:06:57 UTC