Re: OWL Full Features in QRG from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2009-05-06 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2009)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 13:03:20 -0400 (EDT)
To: baojie@gmail.com
Cc: schneid@fzi.de, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20090506.130320.06987626.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OWL Full Features in QRG (was Re: Issue-104)
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:42:29 -0400

> OK. Since all the response so far are against including RDF
> vocabulary, I'm happy to remove them.
> 
> How about just list the 5 OWL terms:
> 
> owl:DataRange, owl:distinctMembers, owl:OntologyProperty,
> owl:DeprecatedClass, owl:DeprecatedProperty
> 
> And indicate that owl:DataRange is deprecated in OWL 2, but others are not.
> 
> As to the name of the section, I still prefer "Additional Vocabulary
> in OWL 2 Full" than the alternative proposal of "Compatibility
> Vocabulary", because the later may lead some people to think that
> those terms are not encouraged to use.

Well, they are not encouraged, at least as far as I am concerned, but I
don't mind the proposed section name.

> Jie

peter

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 17:02:54 UTC