Re: Status of OWL 2 Overview

I don't mind changing it, but if I remember rightly this wording was  
designed to reflect the fact that "industrial strength"  
implementations are (likely to be) based on this kind of technology.  
Anyway, this is purely editorial so we could change it after the next  
round.

Thanks,
Ian


On 16 May 2009, at 22:17, Ivan Herman wrote:

> My apologies to have been silent for a few days, I am on a long  
> trip in
> Australia with only occasional access to the Web...
>
> This is actually not a change v.a.v. the official version, but I found
> this small remark:
>
> [[[
> OWL 2 RL''' enables the implementation of polynomial time reasoning
> algorithms using rule-extended database technologies
> ]]]
>
> I must admit I missed the term 'rule-extended database  
> technologies' in
> the last version. I am not sure why a reference to database  
> technologies
> is necessary here. RL can be implemented by rule technologies. Isn't
> that all? (It can be made _even more efficient_ with a combination of
> database technologies to handle, for example, sameAs, but that is
> another matter...).
>
> But this is a minor thing. Otherwise thumbs up!
>
> Thanks
>
> Ivan
>
> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> Peter, Ivan,
>>
>> As reviewers of Overview can you please take a *very* quick look  
>> at the
>> latest version and confirm that you are OK with any minor changes  
>> that
>> may have occurred since your review and that, in your opinion, the
>> document is ready to move to Last Call.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>
> -- 
>
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Sunday, 17 May 2009 20:30:15 UTC