- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 18:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: baojie@cs.rpi.edu
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, ekendall@sandsoft.com, dlm@cs.rpi.edu
From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu> Subject: Re: Progress on QRG Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:42:20 -0400 > Thanks > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider > <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: >> From: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu> >> Subject: Progress on QRG >> Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:14 -0400 >> >>> Hi All >> >> [...] [...] >> >>> * In linking xsd datatypes, shall we link to xsd1.0 or xsd 1.1? >>> (currently only xsd:dateTimeStamp is linked to xsd1.1) >> >> xsd 1.1 as that is what we are using. >> > Do you mean, e.g., xsd:string should point to > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#string > > but not > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#string (as it is) Correct. peter
Received on Sunday, 3 May 2009 22:46:42 UTC