Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009

this email was mooted by my attending the call today



On May 27, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Peter F.Patel-Schneider wrote:

> This message appears to be truncated.  Did anyone receive a complete
> copy of it?
>
> peter
>
>
> From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Agenda TC 27/05/2009
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:45:14 -0500
>
>> Unfortunately, I will be able to attend the 1pm telcon for travel  
>> reasons.
>>
>> I would like to have my proxy votes (as RPI official stance per AC's
>> instruction) to all the four proposals as given in [1]
>>
>> * PROPOSED: the name of the rdf:text datatype be changed to  
>> rdf:PlainLiteral
>>
>> +1
>>
>> * PROPOSED: rdf:text: A Datatype for RDF Plain Literals is ready for
>> publication as a Candidate Recommendation
>> +1
>>
>> * PROPOSED: go ahead with publication of Structural Specification and
>> Functional-Style Syntax, Mapping to RDF Graphs, Direct Semantics,
>> RDF-Based Semantics, Conformance, Profiles and XML Serialization as
>> Candidate Recommendations as per last week's resolution based on the
>> CR exit criteria and with name change from rdf:text to
>> rdf:PlainLiteral
>>
>> RPI will vote
>> * +1, if the WG acceptsthe RPI proposal on new CR criteria [2],  
>> otherwise
>> * -1, and we reserve our right to object formally later in the  
>> process
>> if it is not changed - this is not because we oppose the design, but
>> because we think the current wording is too vague an
>>
>

"Con un poco de semántica ya se consigue ir muy lejos"

Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler, @jahendler,  
twitter
Tetherless World Constellation Chair
Computer Science Dept
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 17:35:05 UTC