- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:33:36 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 19 May 2009, at 20:15, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> On 19 May 2009, at 19:03, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> >>> I think this can be worked around by instead of wrapping the >>> schema in >>> <pre> tags, instead putting a space in front of each line in the >>> source that doesn't already start with a space. >> >> I already tried this and pretty much every other way. It doesn't >> produce acceptable results. Don't bother. >> >>> The whitespace should be ignored by schema readers, and the initial >>> space forces the line to be preformatted. >>> >>> I'm still looking for a cleaner solution. >> >> The simple solution is to pick a different W3.org temporary URI for >> the download and copy the schema there after stripping off the URI. I >> don't see why this can't be done :) > > I'm not sure I fully understand, but yes, let's stop fighting with the > wiki. I'm guessing someone should maintain the master copy of the > schema. And they should: > > - paste it into whatever wiki page(s) it need(s) to be in, quoted > as necessary, whenever it changes; > > - send me a new copy to put at the namespace, whenever necessary. > > The live-from-the-wiki trick seemed worth a try, but it's not worth a > lot of hassle. The current live-from-the-wiki schema is, minus the pre tags, *the* current schema. So could you put it where you're going to put it? Once I have that uri, I can update the wiki page with the new download link. If it's cvs controlled, I suppose I could take over managing it directly. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 19:29:40 UTC