Mini editorial comment son the QRG

Hi Jie,

just tiny thing (just in time before tonight's vote on the QRG:-)

- Section 1, table on notational conventions, first column last entry: a
missing opening '(' is missing...

- You've put, in section 2.2, a link to

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#def_object_property

in the functional syntax cell for named object property; you should
probably do the same in 2.1 for the named class for symmetry

- Section 2.5, table on Assertions, there is a missing link to the
primer for 'individual equality' (the link is actually identical to the
one for inequality)

- In the same table you have a line for 'positive inverse object
property assertion'. I am not 100% sure it is necessary to have it
there, it seems to reflect the combination of other things in the
functional syntax, and the RDF version is, well, trivial...

- Section 2.8, line on prefix declaration: the "@prefix p U." cell for
RDF syntax might be misunderstood. The way to set the prefix depends on
the serialization and this entry suggests that this is a generic RDF
syntax for it (which is not). I would suggest to leave the cell entry or
put a note into it saying that this depends on RDF serialization... (eg,
SPARQL uses a different syntax...)


Cheers

Ivan


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf